Opinion Number
01-124
Tax Type
Property Tax
Description
Special Assessment for Land Preservation
Topic
Basis of Tax
Property Subject to Tax
Date Issued
02-15-2002

    • The Honorable Judy S. Crook

      Commissioner of the Revenue for Franklin County

      You inquire regarding the revalidation procedure of certain land for special assessment.

      You relate that a taxpayer timely applied for and participates in a locality’s land use assessment program. You also relate that, in 1999, the taxpayer timely filed the locality’s annual revalidation application for continued participation in the program. After filing the application but before the January 1, 2000, assessment date, the taxpayer conveyed two parcels of the qualifying property to his son, which you later discovered. You note that the son has paid rollback taxes on the two parcels.

      You first inquire whether, pursuant to § 58.1-3234 of the Code of Virginia, a commissioner of the revenue may void the taxpayer’s revalidation form for land use assessment as to the remaining property. For the purposes of this opinion, I shall assume that the remaining property meets the acreage necessary to qualify for the special use assessment. I further assume that the use of such property has not changed and that the separation of the parcels in question does not constitute a subdivision of the property under a local ordinance.

      Article 4, Chapter 32 of Title 58.1, §§ 58.1-3229 through 58.1-3244, sets forth the provisions for the special assessment of real property for land preservation. The manifest purpose of these statutes is to create a financial incentive to encourage the preservation and proper use of real estate devoted to agricultural, horticultural, forest, and open-space uses.1 Thus, Article 4 provides for favorable tax treatment of property devoted to such uses so long as such property satisfies the applicable use and acreage requirements, as established in §§ 58.1-3230 and 58.1-3233(2).2

      Section 58.1-3241 addresses the consequences of separating, splitting off, or subdividing lots from real estate which is being valued, assessed, and taxed under a land use assessment program. § 58.1-3241(A) states that such actions "shall not impair the right of each subdivided parcel … to qualify for [special use] valuation, assessment and taxation …, provided it meets the minimum acreage requirements and such other conditions … as may be applicable." Importantly, § 58.1-3241(A) adds that such separation "shall not impair the right of the remaining real estate to [retain] such valuation, assessment and taxation." Accordingly, this Office previously has concluded that § 58.1-3241 makes it clear that the split-off of a small parcel does not, in and of itself, cause an otherwise qualifying larger tract to lose its eligibility for valuation, assessment, and taxation under a land use ordinance during the year in which the split-off occurred.3 In the instant case, therefore, the mere splitting off of the smaller parcels from the large tract does not make such tract ineligible for land use assessment and taxation.

      In order for a property owner to qualify for land use value assessment, § 58.1-3234 requires him to first "submit an application for taxation on the basis of a use assessment to the local assessing officer." You indicate that the taxpayer in issue has properly done so. § 58.1-3234(3) permits a locality, by ordinance, to require the owner to "revalidate annually with such locality, on or before the date on which the last installment of property tax prior to the effective date of the assessment is due, on forms prepared by the locality, any applications previously approved." You provide that the taxpayer also has complied with this requirement.4 Lastly, § 58.1-3234(3) provides:

            • In the event of a material misstatement of facts in the application or a material change in such facts prior to the date of assessment, such application for taxation based on use assessment granted thereunder shall be void and the tax for such year extended on the basis of [fair market] value.[5]
      The facts presented do not suggest that the taxpayer has made a material misstatement of facts in the revalidation application or that a material change in facts has occurred;6 however, this determination is ultimately one to be made by the commissioner of the revenue based on all the relevant facts.7

      You next ask whether a taxpayer may file a petition under § 58.1-3984 to correct an erroneous assessment for removal of a parcel from land use designation. § 58.1-3243 provides that the provisions of Title 58.1 "shall be applicable to assessments and taxation" under the special use provisions, including "the correction of erroneous assessments."

      Finally, you inquire whether a local governing body has the authority to determine whether a particular parcel qualifies for land use assessment and taxation. I am unaware of any statute that authorizes the local governing body to determine if property qualifies for special land use assessment and taxation in an individual case.

      1See 1984 Va. Acts ch. 675, at 1178, 1373 (setting forth declaration of policy in § 58.1-3229, not set out in Virginia Code); 1989 Op. Va. Att’y Gen. 325, 326.

      2See, e.g., 1997 Op. Va. Att’y Gen. 193, 193.

      31985-1986 Op. Va. Att’y Gen. 305, 305.

      4Compare 1985-1986 Op. Va. Att’y Gen. 308 (concluding that, where revalidation form is not timely filed, land use assessment may not continue).

      5See Va. Code Ann. § 58.1-3236(D) (Michie Repl. Vol. 2000).

      6See also § 58.1-3238 (Michie Repl. Vol. 2000) (providing that misstatement of number and identities of known property owners, actual use of property, or intentional misrepresentation of acreage on application shall be considered material misstatement of fact).

      7See §§ 58.1-3233, 58.1-3236 (Michie Repl. Vol. 2000); see also 1996 Op. Va. Att’y Gen. 207, 208.


Attorney General's Opinion

Last Updated 08/25/2014 16:42