Opinion Number
03-123
Tax Type
BPOL Tax
Description
Gross receipts attributable to business conducted in another state or foreign country
Topic
Basis of Tax
Date Issued
01-13-2004

    • The Honorable Riley E. Ingram

      Member, House of Delegates


      Issue Presented

      You inquire concerning the application of § 58.1-3732(B)(2) in calculating gross receipts pursuant to the business, professional and occupational license ("BPOL") tax contained in Chapter 37 of Title 58.1, §§ 58.1-3700 through 58.1-3735.

      Response

      It is my opinion that § 58.1-3732(B)(2) permits a Virginia licensee to deduct, from its base of taxable gross receipts, the gross receipts attributable to business conducted in another state or foreign country, wherein such licensee is liable for or subject to income or other tax based on income.

      Applicable Law and Discussion

      The 1996 Session of the General Assembly enacted legislation requiring uniformity of ordinances governing BPOL taxes.1 The BPOL tax provisions addressed in the 1996 legislation bring uniformity to BPOL tax administration.2 § 58.1-3701 mandates that the Department of Taxation promulgate guidelines, which, by their nature, must amplify and clarify statutory provisions.3 The Department has issued Guidelines for Business, Professional and Occupational License Tax4 ("2000 BPOL Guidelines"), which, pursuant to § 58.1-3701, are "accorded the weight of a regulation." § 58.1-3701 specifically authorizes the Tax Commissioner "to issue advisory written opinions" interpreting the BPOL tax.

      Generally, the BPOL tax is imposed against gross receipts. § 58.1-3700.1 defines "gross receipts" as "the whole, entire, total receipts [of a business], without deduction." The general situs or attribution rules in § 58.1-3703.1(A)(3) determine the assignment of gross receipts to a particular locality.5 Additionally, § 58.1-3732 mandates certain deductions from gross receipts:

            • B. The following shall be deducted from gross receipts or gross purchases that would otherwise be taxable:

              2. Any receipts attributable to business conducted in another state or foreign country in which the taxpayeris liable for an income or other tax based upon income. [Emphasis added.]

      Section 58.1-3732(B)(2) specifically provides that the measurable base for the BPOL tax must be reduced by the amount of gross receipts attributable to business conducted in another state or foreign country wherein the taxpayer is subject to income or other tax based on income.

      The 2000 BPOL Guidelines confirm that § 58.1-3732(B)(2) does not require that the gross receipts for a business conducted out-of-state be fully or partially taxable. It is sufficient that the licensee "is liable for" an income or income-like tax measured on gross receipts.6 The BPOL tax statutes do not require that the gross receipts be taxed in whole, in part, or even taxed at all by the other state or foreign country.7 Thus, the taxpayer may be subject to possible taxation based on income.8 Considering the various attribution methodologies and "tax preference" items, such as tax credits or loss carry forwards, it is conceivable that a licensee may be required to pay tax on only a portion, if any, of the gross receipts attributable to other jurisdictions.9

      Conversely, for the several states that do not impose income or income-like taxes, the gross receipts of a Virginia licensee attributable to business conducted in such nontaxing states would not be deducted from the licensee’s gross receipts. Such gross receipts accordingly are subject to the BPOL tax in the appropriate Virginia localities.10

      Construction placed on the law by agencies charged with administrative duties in connection with the law is entitled to great weight, particularly when the agency has been charged by the General Assembly with construing individual statutes that constitute part of a complex statutory scheme.11 The Department of Taxation and the Tax Commissioner, the agency and official charged with promulgating the BPOL tax guidelines and issuing advisory opinions, concur in these conclusions.12

      Finally, you should note that not all taxes designated as "income taxes" are considered income taxes for Virginia purposes. Likewise, not all taxes designated as another type of tax, such as a franchise tax, may be measured by income in accordance with the requirement of § 58.1-3732(B)(2).13 For these reasons, I refer you to the Tax Commissioner who is authorized to issue opinions14 on questions involving the types of taxes that qualify for the deduction from gross receipts. In addition, the Tax Commissioner has specific information on the allocation and apportionment methods used in other jurisdictions.


      Conclusion

      Accordingly, it is my opinion that § 58.1-3732(B)(2) permits a Virginia licensee to deduct, from its base of taxable gross receipts, the gross receipts attributable to business conducted in another state or foreign country, wherein such licensee is liable for or subject to income or other tax based on income.

      1See 1996 Va. Acts chs. 715, 720, at 1233, 1238-41, 1247, 1251-55, respectively (adding § 58.1-3703.1).

      2See id. at 1233, 1247, respectively (amending and reenacting §§ 58.1-3700, 58.1-3701, 58.1-3703, 58.1-3706, 58.1-3708, and 58.1-3732, adding §§ 58.1-3700.1 and 58.1-3703.1, and repealing §§ 58.1-3707 and 58.1-3725, relating to local BPOL taxation).

      3See Op. Va. Att’y Gen.: 2002 at 293, 295; id. at 297, 298.

      4Dep’t Tax’n, Guidelines for Business, Professional and Occupational License Tax (Jan. 1, 2000) [hereinafter 2000 BPOL Guidelines], available at http://www.tax.state.va.us/Web_PDFs/2000bpol-Sect1.pdf.

      5The BPOL tax applies specific rules to various types of occupations and activities, which inherently are temporary or itinerate in nature. See, e.g., § 58.1-3715(B) (Michie Repl. Vol. 2000) (governing contractors without definite place of business in locality, where contractor’s business exceeds or will exceed $25,000 for license year); § 58.1-3717 (Michie Repl. Vol. 2000) (governing taxation of peddlers and itinerate merchants).

      62000 BPOL Guidelines § 2.6, supra note 4, (providing that taxpayer qualifies for deduction from gross receipts when taxpayer files return for income or income-like tax in another state or foreign country); see also § 58.1-3732(B)(2) (LexisNexis Supp. 2003).

      7See 2000 BPOL Guidelines § 2.6, supra note 4, ("The Virginia taxpayer, however, need not actually pay any tax to take the deduction.")

      8"A taxpayer is liable for an income or other tax based upon income if the taxpayer files a return for such tax in another state or country. Thus, in order to take the deduction, the taxpayer must be required by the laws of another state or foreign country to file an income tax return or other return for a tax based upon income." Tax Comm’r Priv. Ltr. Rul. PD 97-490 (Dec. 19, 1997) (citation omitted) (interpreting 1997 BPOL Guidelines § 3.3.4), available here. Since the Tax Commissioner’s ruling, § 3.3.4 has been amended and renumbered as § 2.6. See 2000 BPOL Guidelines § 2.6, supra note 4.

      9See, e.g., Tax Comm’r Priv. Ltr. Rul. PD 94-175 (June 8, 1994) (noting that, although taxpayer had income from Virginia sources and sufficient nexus with Virginia to subject it to corporate income tax, no actual tax payment was due Virginia, because taxpayer had no positive Virginia apportionment factor), available here. state.va.us/OTP/Policy.nsf.

      10See supra notes 8, 9.

      11See Dep’t of Taxation v. Progressive Cmty. Club, 215 Va. 732, 739, 213 S.E.2d 759, 763 (1975); see also Forst v. Rockingham Poultry Mktg. Coop., 222 Va. 270, 276, 279 S.E.2d 400, 403 (1981). Deference should be given to an administrative interpretation of statutes by the agency charged with the responsibility to carry out legislation. See County of Henrico v. Mgmt. Rec., 221 Va. 1004, 1010, 277 S.E.2d 163, 166-67 (1981) (quoting Progressive Cmty. Club, 215 Va. at 739, 213 S.E.2d at 763); Commonwealth v. Appalach. Elec. Power Co., 193 Va. 37, 45-46, 68 S.E.2d 122, 127 (1951).

      12See supra notes 8, 9 and accompanying text.

      13See Pauley v. Va. Dep’t of Taxation, 55 Va. Cir. 215, 217-18 (2001).

      14See, e.g., Op. Va. Att’y Gen.: 2002 at 308, 311; id. at 297, 299.



Attorney General's Opinion

Last Updated 08/25/2014 16:42