Tax Type
Retail Sales and Use Tax
Description
Nonprofit organization; Must meet all statutory requirements for exemption
Topic
Exemptions
Date Issued
04-20-1990
April 20, 1990
Re: Request for Ruling/Sales and Use Tax
Dear *****************
This will reply to your letter dated February 14, 1990 in which you seek a reconsideration of the department's ruling dated November 20, 1989 regarding the applicability of the sales and use tax to the ****************** (the "Taxpayer").
You maintain that the Taxpayer qualifies for exemption from sales and use taxation pursuant to Virginia Code §58.1-608(8)(k) which provides an exemption for:
-
- [t]angible personal property purchased for use or consumption by or sold by a nonstock, nonprofit charitable organization, exempt from taxation under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and from local real estate taxation, and which is organized exclusively to foster, sponsor and promote physical education, athletic programs and contests for youths in the Commonwealth. (emphasis added)
- [t]angible personal property purchased for use or consumption by or sold by a nonstock, nonprofit charitable organization, exempt from taxation under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and from local real estate taxation, and which is organized exclusively to foster, sponsor and promote physical education, athletic programs and contests for youths in the Commonwealth. (emphasis added)
-
- 1. a nonstock, nonprofit charitable organization exempt from taxation under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;
2. exempt from local real estate taxation; and
3. organized exclusively to foster, sponsor and promote physical education, athletic programs and contests for youths in the Commonwealth.
- 1. a nonstock, nonprofit charitable organization exempt from taxation under §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;
The Virginia Courts have established the rule of strict construction in the interpretation of statutory exemptions. Thus, taxation is the rule and not the exception and statutory exemptions are construed strictly against the taxpayer, with doubts resolved against granting the exemptions (Commonwealth v. Research Analysis Corp., 214 Va. 161, 198 S.E. 2d 622 (1973)).
Since the Taxpayer is organized for many worthy purposes other than fostering, sponsoring and promoting physical education, athletic programs and contests for youths in the Commonwealth, I find no basis for the exemption claimed in this case. Accordingly, the ruling letter dated November 20, 1989 correctly stated the department's determination of the Taxpayer's tax status.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact the department.
Sincerely,
W. H. Forst
Tax Commissioner
Rulings of the Tax Commissioner